Every view on this page, in words and tables. Every entry, with its sources, is in the explorer.
2023 · 45 releases
The first full year after ChatGPT. 11 of the twelve tracked labs released at least one model. Median time between one release and the next: 3.5 days. The busiest week brought 5 releases.
2024 · 92 releases
All twelve tracked labs released at least one model. First on record this year: Moonshot AI. Median time between one release and the next: 2 days. The busiest week brought 9 releases.
2025 · 120 releases
All twelve tracked labs released at least one model. Median time between one release and the next: 2 days. The busiest week brought 6 releases.
2026 · 93 so far
A partial year: 93 releases by 2026-10-19. By the same date in 2025 there were 98. 11 of the twelve tracked labs released at least one model. Median time between one release and the next: 1.5 days. The busiest week brought 7 releases.
Releases and revisions per year. Revisions are counted apart.| Year | Releases | Revisions |
|---|
| 2022 | 2 | 0 |
|---|
| 2023 | 45 | 1 |
|---|
| 2024 | 92 | 3 |
|---|
| 2025 | 120 | 7 |
|---|
| 2026 | 93 | 3 |
|---|
OpenAI: the wait between releases
About 66 days between releases at first, about 22 lately.
Anthropic: the wait between releases
About 104 days between releases at first, about 21 lately.
Google DeepMind: the wait between releases
About 41 days between releases at first, about 15 lately.
Alibaba (Qwen): the wait between releases
About 20.5 days between releases at first, about 11.5 lately.
Releases per lab, by document: on record / not disclosed / not yet checked.| Lab | System card | Model card | Usage policy | Paper |
|---|
| OpenAI | 36 / 12 / 0 | 1 / 47 / 0 | 48 / 0 / 0 | 7 / 41 / 0 |
|---|
| Anthropic | 18 / 8 / 0 | 5 / 21 / 0 | 26 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 26 / 0 |
|---|
| Google DeepMind | 4 / 51 / 0 | 45 / 10 / 0 | 49 / 6 / 0 | 34 / 21 / 0 |
|---|
| Meta | 2 / 24 / 0 | 20 / 5 / 1 | 20 / 5 / 1 | 16 / 10 / 0 |
|---|
| xAI | 9 / 7 / 2 | 2 / 16 / 0 | 18 / 0 / 0 | 0 / 18 / 0 |
|---|
| Mistral | 0 / 41 / 0 | 28 / 13 / 0 | 41 / 0 / 0 | 9 / 32 / 0 |
|---|
| DeepSeek | 0 / 25 / 0 | 24 / 1 / 0 | 25 / 0 / 0 | 20 / 5 / 0 |
|---|
| Alibaba (Qwen) | 0 / 63 / 0 | 48 / 15 / 0 | 63 / 0 / 0 | 32 / 30 / 1 |
|---|
| Moonshot AI | 0 / 10 / 0 | 8 / 2 / 0 | 10 / 0 / 0 | 6 / 4 / 0 |
|---|
| Z.ai (Zhipu) | 0 / 16 / 0 | 13 / 3 / 0 | 16 / 0 / 0 | 14 / 2 / 0 |
|---|
| Cohere | 2 / 15 / 0 | 13 / 4 / 0 | 17 / 0 / 0 | 6 / 11 / 0 |
|---|
| Amazon | 6 / 1 / 0 | 6 / 1 / 0 | 7 / 0 / 0 | 3 / 4 / 0 |
|---|
2023
The first 7 independent scores on record; the highest is 36 on GPQA Diamond.
2024
23 scored this year; the highest is 74.
2025
26 scored this year; the highest is 93.
2026
34 scored so far; the highest is 95.
OpenAI: independent GPQA Diamond scores
First independent GPQA Diamond score on record: 35.7 (GPT-4, 2023). Latest: 89.9 (GPT-5.6 Sol, 2026). Highest: 90.7 (GPT-5.5). 1 of these 17 scored releases has open weights.
Anthropic: independent GPQA Diamond scores
First independent GPQA Diamond score on record: 33.0 (Claude 2.1, 2023). Latest: 92.9 (Claude Opus 5, 2026).
Google DeepMind: independent GPQA Diamond scores
First independent GPQA Diamond score on record: 34.0 (Gemini 1.0 Pro, 2023). Latest: 94.8 (Gemini 3.7 Flash, 2026). 2 of these 12 scored releases have open weights.
Alibaba (Qwen): independent GPQA Diamond scores
First independent GPQA Diamond score on record: 28.8 (Qwen1.5-72B, 2024). Latest: 82.3 (Qwen3.7 Flash, 2026). Highest: 92.7 (Qwen 3.8 Max). 8 of these 14 scored releases have open weights.
A second benchmark
On a second benchmark, SWE-bench Verified (fixing real GitHub issues), Epoch's top score rose from 31 in 2024 to 84 in 2026.
OpenAI: on SWE-bench Verified
On SWE-bench Verified, OpenAI's independent score moves from 48 to 81 across 6 releases on record.
Anthropic: on SWE-bench Verified
On SWE-bench Verified, Anthropic's independent score moves from 61 to 84 across 8 releases on record.
Google DeepMind: on SWE-bench Verified
On SWE-bench Verified, Google DeepMind's independent score moves from 58 to 79 across 3 releases on record.
What the lab said, beside what Epoch measured
5 releases were graded twice on the same benchmark: once by the releasing lab, once by Epoch. 2 of the 6 pairs sit within a single point. In three (Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, GPT-5.4 and GPT-5.5) the lab ran a higher reasoning setting than Epoch, so those gaps include a settings difference. With so few pairs this is not a test of whether labs overstate. Both numbers are kept; neither is averaged.
Lab-reported and independent scores on the same release and benchmark, with settings as written.| Release | Benchmark | LAB | IND | Lab setting | Epoch setting |
|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite | GPQA Diamond | 86.9 | 74.2 | high thinking | low effort |
|---|
| GPT-5.4 | GPQA Diamond | 92.8 | 84.8 | xhigh effort | low effort |
|---|
| GPT-5.5 | GPQA Diamond | 93.6 | 90.7 | xhigh effort | low effort |
|---|
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | GPQA Diamond | 90.1 | 89.6 | max thinking | max effort |
|---|
| DeepSeek-V4-Pro | SWE-bench Verified | 80.6 | 77.6 | max thinking | max effort |
|---|
| GLM-5.2 | GPQA Diamond | 91.2 | 91.9 | not stated | max effort |
|---|
Fewer arrive with a paper
In 2023, 27 of 45 checked releases had a paper on record (60%). In 2026 so far, 22 of 92 (24%). Papers can come out weeks after a release, so recent years may rise.
And fewer have a parameter count on record
In 2023, 26 of 45 releases had a parameter count on record (58%). In 2026 so far, 34 of 93 (37%). Counts reported by others are left out. Epoch often adds counts for recent models late, and we have not checked the blanks against the labs' own pages.
What changed, 2023 to 2026
From 2023 to 2026, the highest independent GPQA Diamond score rose from 36 to 95. The share of checked releases with a paper fell from 60% to 24%, and the share with a parameter count on record fell from 58% to 37%. The share with a system card rose from 11% to 35% (5 of 45, then 32 of 92).